From dc1a437d460d5e100563eb7dde3e0fdc0e8e53d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Schmidt Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 23:31:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify misleading comment in isearch.el Clarify a misleading comment in isearch.el as to whether frame events should exit an isearch or not (Bug#62032, Bug#41338 for background information). * lisp/isearch.el (isearch-mode-map): Replace the misleading comment. (Bug#62032) Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes --- lisp/isearch.el | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/isearch.el b/lisp/isearch.el index 094e02d605e..3d2bbda4975 100644 --- a/lisp/isearch.el +++ b/lisp/isearch.el @@ -633,9 +633,9 @@ This is like `describe-bindings', but displays only Isearch keys." (define-key map "\M-\t" 'isearch-complete) - ;; Pass frame events transparently so they won't exit the search. - ;; In particular, if we have more than one display open, then a - ;; switch-frame might be generated by someone typing at another keyboard. + ;; Frame events should exit the search, because such frame events + ;; as `switch-frame’ and `delete-frame’ change the current buffer. + ;; See Bug#41338 for details. (define-key map [switch-frame] nil) (define-key map [delete-frame] nil) (define-key map [iconify-frame] nil) -- 2.39.2