From cd63e3a185357e4a8a118173ef31faac5286287d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Stallman" Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:28:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Comment change. --- lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el index 5441083a8b2..5594b918b37 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el @@ -1151,6 +1151,10 @@ ;;; state, so that constant folding them would be wrong, ;;; but we don't do constant folding based on this list. +;;; However, at present the only optimization we normally do +;;; is delete calls that need not occur, and we only do that +;;; with the error-free functions. + ;;; I wonder if I missed any :-\) (let ((side-effect-free-fns '(% * + - / /= 1+ 1- < <= = > >= abs acos append aref ash asin atan -- 2.39.5