From c2e4c68333d72a342bb531449412a424b3507a65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Jo=C3=A3o=20T=C3=A1vora?= Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 11:57:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Eglot: another tweak to eglot--sig-info Going to the start of the first param and skipping non-word syntax backward would seem to be the right thing to do, for traditional C-style languages and also languages like Ocaml where function signatures don't start the param list with '('. See also https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/discussions/1251. * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el (eglot--sig-info): Rework again. --- lisp/progmodes/eglot.el | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el index 897cf3bc93e..f09c348143d 100644 --- a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el +++ b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el @@ -3212,7 +3212,7 @@ for which LSP on-type-formatting should be requested." parameter (when (zerop i) (goto-char (elt parlabel 0)) - (search-backward "(" nil t) + (skip-syntax-backward "^w") (add-face-text-property (point-min) (point) 'font-lock-function-name-face)) ;; ...perhaps highlight it in the formals list -- 2.39.2