From a081b6625bd3afa67d82403de8fa02de7e428bfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shynur Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 11:45:28 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ; Updated Elispref-Manual: `nil' cannot be defun'ed * doc/lispref/functions.texi (Function Cells): Fix inaccuracy. (Bug#62746) --- doc/lispref/functions.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/lispref/functions.texi b/doc/lispref/functions.texi index 948c6bb96f8..4ab7a194eb0 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/functions.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/functions.texi @@ -1482,7 +1482,7 @@ the symbol as a function, Emacs signals a @code{void-function} error. Note that void is not the same as @code{nil} or the symbol @code{void}. The symbols @code{nil} and @code{void} are Lisp objects, and can be stored into a function cell just as any other object can be -(and they can be valid functions if you define them in turn with +(and @code{void} can be a valid function if you define it with @code{defun}). A void function cell contains no object whatsoever. You can test the voidness of a symbol's function definition with -- 2.39.5