From 99ef737304f9976dd8f6955cbb689a26da5298bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Stallman" Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:50:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] (Indirect Buffers): Clarify. --- lispref/buffers.texi | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lispref/buffers.texi b/lispref/buffers.texi index e0ef75ccae8..a0769be23dd 100644 --- a/lispref/buffers.texi +++ b/lispref/buffers.texi @@ -1067,11 +1067,11 @@ in the other. This includes the text properties as well as the characters themselves. In all other respects, the indirect buffer and its base buffer are -completely separate. They have different names, different values of -point, different narrowing, different markers and overlays (though +completely separate. They have different names, independent values of +point, independent narrowing, independent markers and overlays (though inserting or deleting text in either buffer relocates the markers and -overlays for both), different major modes, and different buffer-local -variables. +overlays for both), independent major modes, and independent +buffer-local variable bindings. An indirect buffer cannot visit a file, but its base buffer can. If you try to save the indirect buffer, that actually saves the base -- 2.39.2