From 83509348eb41b187755439685fc363fb680e7788 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Stallman" Date: Sun, 18 Jun 1995 18:45:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] *** empty log message *** --- etc/FAQ | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/etc/FAQ b/etc/FAQ index 0d352f527a6..84c1c058107 100644 --- a/etc/FAQ +++ b/etc/FAQ @@ -1436,6 +1436,8 @@ Common Things People Want To Do Bugs/Problems 61: Does Emacs have problems with files larger than 8 megabytes? +[This problem has been solved better in Emacs 19.29 because the buffer +size limit is now 16 times as large.] Most installed versions of GNU Emacs will use 24-bit signed integers (and 24-bit pointers) internally. This limits the file size that Emacs can @@ -1891,9 +1893,10 @@ Finding/Getting Emacs and Related Packages 81: What is the difference between Emacs and Epoch? - Epoch was a modified version of GNU Emacs. It is currently being merged + Epoch was a modified version of GNU Emacs. It was merged into XEmacs (formerly "Lucid Emacs"), and the Epoch redisplay, now - being rewritten, is slated to be merged into Emacs when the rewrite is done. + being totally rewritten, is slated to be merged into Emacs when the + rewrite is done. 82: What is the difference between Emacs and XEmacs (formerly "Lucid Emacs")? @@ -1904,8 +1907,8 @@ Finding/Getting Emacs and Related Packages maintainers, had been included here. Richard Stallman removed it from this copy of the FAQ because it was unfair. It was (1) one-sided, listing only advantages of XEmacs and not advantages of - the principal version of Emacs, (2) biased, involving opinions the - FSF doesn't share, and (3) out of date, listing as advantages of + the principal version of Emacs, (2) biased, stating the opinions + of the XEmacs maintainers, and (3) out of date, listing as advantages of XEmacs features which in fact both versions have. 83: Where can I get Emacs for my PC running MS-DOS? -- 2.39.2