From 7a6a17280d3bb921023587ba549398eea0d0ecf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:48:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] (Declaring Functions): Fix typo in directive. --- doc/lispref/functions.texi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/lispref/functions.texi b/doc/lispref/functions.texi index b8fc9a41954..182d26511b1 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/functions.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/functions.texi @@ -1252,12 +1252,12 @@ first use of the function in question: @smallexample (declare-function gud-find-c-expr "gud.el" nil) -@end smalllexample +@end smallexample This says that @code{gud-find-c-expr} is defined in @file{gud.el} (the @samp{.el} can be omitted). The compiler takes for granted that that file really defines the function, and does not check. - + The optional third argument specifies the argument list of @code{gud-find-c-expr}. In this case, it takes no arguments (@code{nil} is different from not specifying a value). In other -- 2.39.2