From 74edaf1f3e6b0ff6669d481162cdd62828997f17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jay Belanger Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:43:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] (Types Tutorial Exercise 2): Fix wording. --- doc/misc/calc.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/misc/calc.texi b/doc/misc/calc.texi index ab6691c95a7..1be0079b243 100644 --- a/doc/misc/calc.texi +++ b/doc/misc/calc.texi @@ -8031,7 +8031,7 @@ But if @w{@samp{17 inf = inf}}, then @samp{17 inf / inf = inf / inf = 17}, too. @samp{exp(inf) = inf}. It's tempting to say that the exponential of infinity must be ``bigger'' than ``regular'' infinity, but as -far as Calc is concerned all infinities are as just as big. +far as Calc is concerned all infinities are the same size. In other words, as @expr{x} goes to infinity, @expr{e^x} also goes to infinity, but the fact the @expr{e^x} grows much faster than @expr{x} is not relevant here. -- 2.39.5