From 735086e440aa748072be547f04c8878ac3798723 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:39:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Recommend against using uce.el * lisp/mail/uce.el (uce-reply-to-uce): Recommend against its use on the first invocation. (Bug#46472) --- lisp/mail/uce.el | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lisp/mail/uce.el b/lisp/mail/uce.el index b07004de38c..4347ff14022 100644 --- a/lisp/mail/uce.el +++ b/lisp/mail/uce.el @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ ;; uce-reply-to-uce. Please let me know about your changes so I can ;; incorporate them. I'd appreciate it. +;; NOTE: We don't recommend using this feature; see the message in +;; 'uce-reply-to-uce' for the reasons. + ;; The command uce-reply-to-uce, if called when the current message ;; buffer is a UCE, will setup a reply *mail* buffer as follows. It ;; scans the full headers of the message for: 1) the normal return @@ -213,6 +216,8 @@ These are mostly meant for headers that prevent delivery errors reporting." (declare-function rmail-maybe-set-message-counters "rmail" ()) (declare-function rmail-toggle-header "rmail" (&optional arg)) +(defvar uce--usage-warning-displayed nil) + ;;;###autoload (defun uce-reply-to-uce (&optional _ignored) "Compose a reply to unsolicited commercial email (UCE). @@ -358,7 +363,32 @@ You might need to set `uce-mail-reader' before using this." ;; Run hooks before we leave buffer for editing. Reasonable usage ;; might be to set up special key bindings, replace standard ;; functions in mail-mode, etc. - (run-hooks 'mail-setup-hook 'uce-setup-hook)))) + (run-hooks 'mail-setup-hook 'uce-setup-hook))) + (unless uce--usage-warning-displayed + (setq uce--usage-warning-displayed t) + (pop-to-buffer (get-buffer-create "uce-reply-to-uce warning")) + (insert "\ +-- !!! NOTE !!! --------------------------------------------- + +Replying to spam is at best pointless, but most likely actively +harmful. + +- You will confirm that your email address is valid, thus ensuring + you get more spam. + +- You will leak information and open yourself up for further + attack. For example, they could use your \"geolocation\" to find + your home address and phone number. + +- The sender address is likely fake. + +- You help them refine their methods of spamming. + +Therefore, we strongly recommend that you do not use this package. +Use a spam filter instead, or just delete the spam. + +------------------------------------------------------------- +"))) (defun uce-insert-ranting (&optional _ignored) "Insert text of the usual reply to UCE into current buffer." -- 2.39.2