From 6b9d0764ce214e41b2794a07600c5f06bc1c57f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Spiegel?= Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:53:14 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Removed the comment that said we assume strict locking. (vc-next-action-dired): Don't switch to vc-parent-buffer, because that was already done. --- lisp/vc.el | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/vc.el b/lisp/vc.el index cdd6697398f..7d2d6092576 100644 --- a/lisp/vc.el +++ b/lisp/vc.el @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ ;; doesn't understand -t-; this has been known to happen to people running ;; NExTSTEP 3.0. ;; -;; The RCS code assumes strict locking. You can support the RCS -x option -;; by adding pairs to the vc-master-templates list. +;; You can support the RCS -x option by adding pairs to the +;; vc-master-templates list. ;; ;; Proper function of the SCCS diff commands requires the shellscript vcdiff ;; to be installed somewhere on Emacs's path for executables. @@ -604,7 +604,6 @@ to an optional list of FLAGS." (defun vc-next-action-dired (file rev comment) ;; We've accepted a log comment, now do a vc-next-action using it on all ;; marked files. - (set-buffer vc-parent-buffer) (let ((configuration (current-window-configuration))) (dired-map-over-marks (save-window-excursion -- 2.39.2