From 69b0acb95690de72a80beedf114f8f0896ef1354 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:02:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Further `declare' clarifications * macros.texi (Defining Macros): Don't claim that `declare' only affects Edebug and indentation. --- doc/lispref/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ doc/lispref/macros.texi | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/lispref/ChangeLog b/doc/lispref/ChangeLog index feab1a33cc7..69eca805eea 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/ChangeLog +++ b/doc/lispref/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2012-01-26 Lars Ingebrigtsen + + * macros.texi (Defining Macros): Don't claim that `declare' only + affects Edebug and indentation. + 2012-01-25 Lars Ingebrigtsen * macros.texi (Defining Macros): Slight `declare' fixup. diff --git a/doc/lispref/macros.texi b/doc/lispref/macros.texi index 160a4636218..3804d963108 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/macros.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/macros.texi @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ without evaluating any @var{specs}. No macro absolutely needs a @code{declare} form, because that form has no effect on how the macro expands, on what the macro means in the -program. It only affects secondary features: indentation and Edebug. +program. It only affects the secondary features listed above. @node Backquote @section Backquote -- 2.39.2