From 60a81f44e49c77ef9143a665f94f89109002133d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrea Corallo Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:11:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] better naming variable --- src/comp.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/comp.c b/src/comp.c index bb2b851e55a..e2629de0426 100644 --- a/src/comp.c +++ b/src/comp.c @@ -2285,7 +2285,7 @@ define_CAR_CDR (void) gcc_jit_context_new_param (comp.ctxt, NULL, comp.bool_type, - "is_cons") }; + "cert_cons") }; /* TODO: understand why after ipa-prop pass gcc is less keen on inlining and as consequence can refuse to compile these. (see dhrystone.el) Flag this and all the one involved in ipa-prop as @@ -2374,7 +2374,7 @@ define_setcar_setcdr (void) gcc_jit_context_new_param (comp.ctxt, NULL, comp.bool_type, - "is_cons") }; + "cert_cons") }; gcc_jit_function **f_ref = !i ? &comp.setcar : &comp.setcdr; *f_ref = gcc_jit_context_new_function (comp.ctxt, NULL, @@ -2443,7 +2443,7 @@ define_add1_sub1 (void) gcc_jit_context_new_param (comp.ctxt, NULL, comp.bool_type, - "is_fixnum") }; + "cert_fixnum") }; comp.func = func[i] = gcc_jit_context_new_function (comp.ctxt, NULL, GCC_JIT_FUNCTION_INTERNAL, @@ -2457,7 +2457,7 @@ define_add1_sub1 (void) comp.block = entry_block; - /* is_fixnum || + /* cert_fixnum || ((FIXNUMP (n) && XFIXNUM (n) != MOST_POSITIVE_FIXNUM ? (XFIXNUM (n) + 1) : Fadd1 (n)) */ @@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ define_negate (void) gcc_jit_context_new_param (comp.ctxt, NULL, comp.bool_type, - "is_fixnum") }; + "cert_fixnum") }; comp.func = comp.negate = gcc_jit_context_new_function (comp.ctxt, NULL, @@ -2541,7 +2541,7 @@ define_negate (void) comp.block = entry_block; - /* (is_fixnum || FIXNUMP (TOP)) && XFIXNUM (TOP) != MOST_NEGATIVE_FIXNUM + /* (cert_fixnum || FIXNUMP (TOP)) && XFIXNUM (TOP) != MOST_NEGATIVE_FIXNUM ? make_fixnum (- XFIXNUM (TOP)) : Fminus (1, &TOP)) */ gcc_jit_lvalue *n = gcc_jit_param_as_lvalue (param[0]); -- 2.39.5