From 4e59ecc646e88a7a756f1850d92fd2b8780513eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Rudalics Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 10:30:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix wording in Elisp manual's child frames section (Bug#28819) * doc/lispref/frames.texi (Child Frames): Fix wording (Bug#28819). --- doc/lispref/frames.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/lispref/frames.texi b/doc/lispref/frames.texi index 07a8b825026..ad853418ac4 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/frames.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/frames.texi @@ -3202,7 +3202,7 @@ a number of other ways as well. Here we sketch a few of them: @item The semantics of maximizing and iconifying child frames is highly window-system dependent. As a rule, applications should never invoke -these operations for on frames. By default, invoking +these operations on child frames. By default, invoking @code{iconify-frame} on a child frame will try to iconify the top-level frame corresponding to that child frame instead. To obtain a different behavior, users may customize the option @code{iconify-child-frame} -- 2.39.2