From 44d51d846021b503fa5e8fe9683efd243c9b24f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Katsumi Yamaoka Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 02:00:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] message.el (message-subject-trailing-was-regexp): Fix default value. --- lisp/gnus/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ lisp/gnus/message.el | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog b/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog index 4855dc195ea..81c83e4a988 100644 --- a/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog +++ b/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2010-11-09 Katsumi Yamaoka + + * message.el (message-subject-trailing-was-regexp): Fix default value. + 2010-11-07 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen * gnus-start.el (gnus-get-unread-articles): Ignore totally non-existent diff --git a/lisp/gnus/message.el b/lisp/gnus/message.el index 722ef430298..42f67035c13 100644 --- a/lisp/gnus/message.el +++ b/lisp/gnus/message.el @@ -337,14 +337,14 @@ It is okay to create some false positives here, as the user is asked." :type 'regexp) (defcustom message-subject-trailing-was-regexp - "[ \t]*\\((*[Ww][Aa][Ss]:[ \t]*.*)\\)" + "[ \t]*\\((*[Ww][Aa][Ss][ \t]*.*)\\)" "*Regexp matching \"(was: )\" in the subject line. If `message-subject-trailing-was-query' is set to t, the subject is matched against `message-subject-trailing-was-regexp' in `message-strip-subject-trailing-was'. You should use a regexp creating very few false positives here." - :version "22.1" + :version "24.1" :group 'message-various :link '(custom-manual "(message)Message Headers") :type 'regexp) -- 2.39.5