From 3ce37db9882aff24301716e638999e0888195083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Mattias=20Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:57:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove mention of old dotted-list reader quirk from manual * doc/lispref/objects.texi (Dotted Pair Notation): The (. X) reader peculiarity is no more (bug#62020). --- doc/lispref/objects.texi | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/lispref/objects.texi b/doc/lispref/objects.texi index 99a3c073971..2fe7e6db560 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/objects.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/objects.texi @@ -1007,13 +1007,6 @@ It looks like this: @end example @end ifnottex - As a somewhat peculiar side effect of @code{(a b . c)} and -@code{(a . (b . c))} being equivalent, for consistency this means -that if you replace @code{b} here with the empty sequence, then it -follows that @code{(a . c)} and @code{(a . ( . c))} are equivalent, -too. This also means that @code{( . c)} is equivalent to @code{c}, -but this is seldom used. - @node Association List Type @subsubsection Association List Type -- 2.39.2