From 30b0b0e2e20fe2b944aec4be816aab2cf489eb91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eli Zaretskii Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:11:05 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Fix handling of abbreviated control command in gdb-mi.el * lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el (gdb-control-commands-regexp): Support unambiguous abbreviations of commands. (Bug#32576) --- lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el b/lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el index 32d5ced67d0..0506386a75d 100644 --- a/lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el +++ b/lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el @@ -1782,9 +1782,10 @@ static char *magick[] = { (defvar gdb-control-commands-regexp (concat "^\\(" - "commands\\|if\\|while\\|define\\|document\\|" + "comm\\(a\\(n\\(ds?\\)?\\)?\\)?\\|if\\|while" + "\\|def\\(i\\(ne?\\)?\\)?\\|doc\\(u\\(m\\(e\\(nt?\\)?\\)?\\)?\\)?\\|" gdb-python-guile-commands-regexp - "\\|while-stepping\\|stepping\\|ws\\|actions" + "\\|while-stepping\\|stepp\\(i\\(ng?\\)?\\)?\\|ws\\|actions" "\\)\\([[:blank:]]+\\([^[:blank:]]*\\)\\)?$") "Regexp matching GDB commands that enter a recursive reading loop. As long as GDB is in the recursive reading loop, it does not expect -- 2.39.2