From 097452efbc0d087fbff401651bc6379721202243 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philipp Stephani Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:18:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el (ert-select-tests): Simplify nested switch --- lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el | 82 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el index da14b93d1bf..e3e85b5cefb 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el @@ -1015,52 +1015,42 @@ contained in UNIVERSE." (unless (ert-test-boundp selector) (signal 'ert-test-unbound (list selector))) (list (ert-get-test selector))) - (`(,operator . ,operands) - (cl-ecase operator - (member - (mapcar (lambda (purported-test) - (pcase-exhaustive purported-test - ((pred symbolp) - (unless (ert-test-boundp purported-test) - (signal 'ert-test-unbound - (list purported-test))) - (ert-get-test purported-test)) - ((pred ert-test-p) purported-test))) - operands)) - (eql - (cl-assert (eql (length operands) 1)) - (ert-select-tests `(member ,@operands) universe)) - (and - ;; Do these definitions of AND, NOT and OR satisfy de - ;; Morgan's laws? Should they? - (cl-case (length operands) - (0 (ert-select-tests 't universe)) - (t (ert-select-tests `(and ,@(cdr operands)) - (ert-select-tests (car operands) - universe))))) - (not - (cl-assert (eql (length operands) 1)) - (let ((all-tests (ert-select-tests 't universe))) - (cl-set-difference all-tests - (ert-select-tests (car operands) - all-tests)))) - (or - (cl-case (length operands) - (0 (ert-select-tests 'nil universe)) - (t (cl-union (ert-select-tests (car operands) universe) - (ert-select-tests `(or ,@(cdr operands)) - universe))))) - (tag - (cl-assert (eql (length operands) 1)) - (let ((tag (car operands))) - (ert-select-tests `(satisfies - ,(lambda (test) - (member tag (ert-test-tags test)))) - universe))) - (satisfies - (cl-assert (eql (length operands) 1)) - (cl-remove-if-not (car operands) - (ert-select-tests 't universe))))))) + (`(member . ,operands) + (mapcar (lambda (purported-test) + (pcase-exhaustive purported-test + ((pred symbolp) + (unless (ert-test-boundp purported-test) + (signal 'ert-test-unbound + (list purported-test))) + (ert-get-test purported-test)) + ((pred ert-test-p) purported-test))) + operands)) + (`(eql ,operand) + (ert-select-tests `(member ,operand) universe)) + ;; Do these definitions of AND, NOT and OR satisfy de Morgan's + ;; laws? Should they? + (`(and) + (ert-select-tests 't universe)) + (`(and ,first . ,rest) + (ert-select-tests `(and ,@rest) + (ert-select-tests first universe))) + (`(not ,operand) + (let ((all-tests (ert-select-tests 't universe))) + (cl-set-difference all-tests + (ert-select-tests operand all-tests)))) + (`(or) + (ert-select-tests 'nil universe)) + (`(or ,first . ,rest) + (cl-union (ert-select-tests first universe) + (ert-select-tests `(or ,@rest) universe))) + (`(tag ,tag) + (ert-select-tests `(satisfies + ,(lambda (test) + (member tag (ert-test-tags test)))) + universe)) + (`(satisfies ,predicate) + (cl-remove-if-not predicate + (ert-select-tests 't universe))))) (define-error 'ert-test-unbound "ERT test is unbound") -- 2.39.2