From: Noam Postavsky Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 04:02:05 +0000 (-0500) Subject: * doc/lispref/functions.texi (Inline Functions): Fix typo (Bug#30238). X-Git-Tag: emacs-26.1-rc1~269 X-Git-Url: http://git.eshelyaron.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e21f0189f3fab8264e05c26056324e878f166c1c;p=emacs.git * doc/lispref/functions.texi (Inline Functions): Fix typo (Bug#30238). --- diff --git a/doc/lispref/functions.texi b/doc/lispref/functions.texi index 277a42d2c2f..b53d1f0bb90 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/functions.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/functions.texi @@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@ to verify that using @code{defun} actually has performance problems. After an inline function is defined, its inline expansion can be performed later on in the same file, just like macros. - It's possible to use @code{defsubst} to define a macro to expand + It's possible to use @code{defmacro} to define a macro to expand into the same code that an inline function would execute (@pxref{Macros}). But the macro would be limited to direct use in expressions---a macro cannot be called with @code{apply},