From: Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:50:39 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: (Preactivation, Activation of Advice): Minor cleanup.
X-Git-Tag: emacs-pretest-23.0.90~9473
X-Git-Url: http://git.eshelyaron.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b1baed0bc232113e84f5a13e07793e089414d86c;p=emacs.git

(Preactivation, Activation of Advice): Minor cleanup.
---

diff --git a/doc/lispref/advice.texi b/doc/lispref/advice.texi
index 7eb89d7bd41..168135ef794 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/advice.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/advice.texi
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ that results from activating advice for a function.
 A value of @code{always} specifies to compile unconditionally.
 A value of @code{never} specifies never compile the advice.
 
-A value of @code{maybe} specifies to compile if the byte-compiler is
+A value of @code{maybe} specifies to compile if the byte compiler is
 already loaded.  A value of @code{like-original} specifies to compile
 the advice if the original definition of the advised function is
 compiled or a built-in function.
@@ -545,11 +545,11 @@ work properly, because of a mismatch.
 Activation of the advised
 function takes longer than usual.
 @item
-The byte-compiler gets
+The byte compiler gets
 loaded while an advised function gets activated.
 @item
 @code{byte-compile} is included in the value of @code{features} even
-though you did not ever explicitly use the byte-compiler.
+though you did not ever explicitly use the byte compiler.
 @end itemize
 
 Compiled preactivated advice works properly even if the function itself