From: Stefan Kangas Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 03:08:43 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Improve wording in symbols.texi X-Git-Url: http://git.eshelyaron.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a9b257a397cdd6d1852ae78a193c4263fc6ea18b;p=emacs.git Improve wording in symbols.texi * doc/lispref/symbols.texi (Symbol Components): Improve wording (Bug#75512). Reported by Matt Trzcinski . (cherry picked from commit 3bccd04c5c659307231f9e03895d71d26c1d5f8f) --- diff --git a/doc/lispref/symbols.texi b/doc/lispref/symbols.texi index 4a505768b58..87f0e43eef9 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/symbols.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/symbols.texi @@ -106,11 +106,11 @@ reference any object. (This is not the same thing as holding the symbol a value cell that is void results in an error, such as @samp{Symbol's value as variable is void}. - Because each symbol has separate value and function cells, variables -names and function names do not conflict. For example, the symbol -@code{buffer-file-name} has a value (the name of the file being -visited in the current buffer) as well as a function definition (a -primitive function that returns the name of the file): + Because each symbol has separate value and function cells, the names +of variables and functions do not conflict. For example, the symbol +@code{buffer-file-name} has a value (the name of the file being visited +in the current buffer) as well as a function definition (a primitive +function that returns the name of the file): @example buffer-file-name