From: Mattias EngdegÄrd Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:13:10 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Don't use pointer arithmetic for untagging Lisp values X-Git-Url: http://git.eshelyaron.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=056c99a34c143e1b5162366db07a143ac2b10631;p=emacs.git Don't use pointer arithmetic for untagging Lisp values * src/lisp.h (XUNTAG): Instead of casting a Lisp value to char * and subtracting the tag, cast it to a suitable integral type and work on that. This should result in identical or at least equivalent code, except that it avoids potential problems arising from the restrictions on pointer arithmetic in C. In particular, a null pointer can be neither an operand in nor the result of pointer arithmetic. C compilers know this and would, prior to this change, optimise XUNTAG(obj, Lisp_Int0, mytype) != NULL to 1. This means, for example, that make_pointer_integer and XFIXNUMPTR could not be entrusted with null pointers, and next_vector in alloc.c was unsafe to use. --- diff --git a/src/lisp.h b/src/lisp.h index 50b68f2e767..35a88d9b238 100644 --- a/src/lisp.h +++ b/src/lisp.h @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ INLINE void extracted pointer's type is CTYPE *. */ #define XUNTAG(a, type, ctype) ((ctype *) \ - ((char *) XLP (a) - LISP_WORD_TAG (type))) + ((uintptr_t) XLP (a) - LISP_WORD_TAG (type))) /* A forwarding pointer to a value. It uses a generic pointer to avoid alignment bugs that could occur if it used a pointer to a