From: Eli Zaretskii Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 12:10:37 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Remove the file. X-Git-Tag: emacs-pretest-22.0.90~2099 X-Git-Url: http://git.eshelyaron.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=04a1dad0855a77fc160d38c0b91a107168c97475;p=emacs.git Remove the file. --- diff --git a/etc/LEDIT b/etc/LEDIT deleted file mode 100644 index 009243f5ec0..00000000000 --- a/etc/LEDIT +++ /dev/null @@ -1,77 +0,0 @@ -Date: 17 Apr 85 15:45:42 EST (Wed) -From: Martin David Connor - - Date: Sat, 13 Apr 85 16:28:15 est - From: Richard M. Stallman - - Can you help this person? Also, can you give me the rest of ledit - to distribute, plus some info on how to use it? - -I have put the files "ledit.l" and "leditcfns.c" on prep:~mdc. -Much to my disgust ledit.l relied on some bogus little package of -functions on HT, so I had to massage it a bit. - -To get it to work, one must: - - - Compile leditcfns.c with something like: - - cc leditcfns.c - - - Edit ledit.l, changing the line beginning "(cfasl" to - have the right pathname for the cfns file you compiled in - the last step. - - - Compile ledit.l with: - - liszt ledit.l - -Then put the following lines in your .lisprc file: - - ;load in functions for emacs interface - (load "//src//mdc//ledit//ledit") ; Location of Ledit library - (set-proc-str "%gnumacs") ; Name of editor - -Then you can use ^E to get from LISP back to gnumacs. - -Here is the part of my .emacs file that pertains to ledit. - - ;;; Set up ledit mode - (setq ledit-go-to-lisp-string "%lisp") - (setq lisp-mode-hook 'ledit-from-lisp-mode) - - Date: Sat, 13 Apr 85 11:26:32 cst - From: neves@wisc-ai.arpa (David Neves) - - This is a documentation question. - I cannot figure out how to use Ledit. I suspect I need some - function on the Franz Lisp end of things to go to Emacs and read in - the temporary file. Is this true? Is the Lisp job started within - Emacs or outside of emacs? I'm just plain confused. Perhaps a couple - of words from someone in the know would help. - - A related question. I have been using a shell buffer when interacting - with Lisp (ie. put a definition in the kill buffer and then yank it - into the shell buffer to redefine it). This is nice but tends to fill - up the shell buffer with lots of code (I'd rather keep calls to functions - in the shell and not the functions themselves). - My question: Is using the shell buffer "better" than ledit? Am I using - it in the best way (i.e. copying definitions from an edit buffer to the - shell buffer)? -Thanks, David Neves - -I have found that ledit works well for doing programming development -when you are changing lots of little pieces of a file and don't wish -to recompile the whole file. Of course M-X Compile is very nice for -calling up a liszt on a buffer and watching it in the another window. -Of course the interface of something like NIL is even better because -you can compile your function directly into your lisp. But since NIL -doesn't run under Unix, this is probably the next best thing. - -I have tried the 2 window method (shell in lower window, lisp code in -upper), and have found it a little awkward. It does have certain -advantages, but most of the time, I get be fine using M-C-D to save a -defun for lisp, and C-X Z to jump back to LISP. C-E RETURN from lisp -is also mnemonic for getting back to gnumacs. - -I hope this helps somewhat. - - diff --git a/lib-src/leditcfns.c b/lib-src/leditcfns.c deleted file mode 100644 index 239db1cd1fa..00000000000 --- a/lib-src/leditcfns.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -#include -#include -#define STRLEN 100 -static char str[STRLEN+1] = "%?emacs"; /* extra char for the null */ - -switch_to_proc(){ - char *ptr = str; - while (*ptr) ioctl(0, TIOCSTI, ptr++); - ioctl(0, TIOCSTI, "\n"); - kill(getpid(), SIGTSTP); - } - -set_proc_str(ptr) char *ptr; { - if (strlen(ptr) <= STRLEN) - strcpy(str, ptr); - else - printf("string too long for set-proc-str: %s\n", ptr); - } - -/* arch-tag: eb7ae804-0d6e-4077-ab42-7173821410c3 - (do not change this comment) */