cast-end
;; Have we got a new-style C++11 "auto"?
new-style-auto
+ ;; Set when the symbol before `preceding-token-end' is known to
+ ;; terminate the previous construct, or when we're at point-min.
+ at-decl-start
;; Save `c-record-type-identifiers' and
;; `c-record-ref-identifiers' since ranges are recorded
;; speculatively and should be thrown away if it turns out
(save-rec-type-ids c-record-type-identifiers)
(save-rec-ref-ids c-record-ref-identifiers))
+ (save-excursion
+ (goto-char preceding-token-end)
+ (setq at-decl-start
+ (or (bobp)
+ (let ((tok-end (point)))
+ (c-backward-token-2)
+ (member (buffer-substring-no-properties (point) tok-end)
+ c-pre-start-tokens)))))
+
(while (c-forward-annotation)
(c-forward-syntactic-ws))
at-type
(or at-decl-end (looking-at "=[^=]"))
(not context)
- (not got-suffix))
- ;; Got something like "foo * bar;". Since we're not inside an
- ;; arglist it would be a meaningless expression because the
- ;; result isn't used. We therefore choose to recognize it as
- ;; a declaration. Do not allow a suffix since it could then
- ;; be a function call.
+ (or (not got-suffix)
+ at-decl-start))
+ ;; Got something like "foo * bar;". Since we're not inside
+ ;; an arglist it would be a meaningless expression because
+ ;; the result isn't used. We therefore choose to recognize
+ ;; it as a declaration. We only allow a suffix (which makes
+ ;; the construct look like a function call) when
+ ;; `at-decl-start' provides additional evidence that we do
+ ;; have a declaration.
(throw 'at-decl-or-cast t))
;; CASE 17
(c-lang-defconst c-haskell-op-re
t (c-make-keywords-re nil (c-lang-const c-haskell-op)))
(c-lang-defvar c-haskell-op-re (c-lang-const c-haskell-op-re))
+
+(c-lang-defconst c-pre-start-tokens
+ "List of operators following which an apparent declaration \(e.g.
+\"t1 *fn (t2 *b);\") is most likely to be an actual declaration
+\(as opposed to an arithmetic expression)."
+ t '(";" "{" "}"))
+(c-lang-defvar c-pre-start-tokens (c-lang-const c-pre-start-tokens))
+
\f
;;; Syntactic whitespace.