lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Fix argument name in docstring.

diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog
index e841238524cc375c064adff5f04e7f80511faa74..b4d62f105e92f717c9d9a3e99adaa3c0e9e2892c 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2011-03-01  Juanma Barranquero  <lekktu@gmail.com>
+
+       * emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Fix argument name in docstring.
+
 2011-03-01  Glenn Morris  <rgm@gnu.org>
 
        * calendar/cal-hebrew.el (calendar-hebrew-birthday, diary-hebrew-date):

diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el
index 8e192a18459f1fb4d88d87b7350c812b604d9742..08001171ed1c93c762c38ef4046f15e7bcc0b63c 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Not documented
 ;;;;;;  do-all-symbols do-symbols dotimes dolist do* do loop return-from
 ;;;;;;  return block etypecase typecase ecase case load-time-value
 ;;;;;;  eval-when destructuring-bind function* defmacro* defun* gentemp
-;;;;;;  gensym) "cl-macs" "cl-macs.el" "0904b956872432ae7cc5fa9abcefce63")
+;;;;;;  gensym) "cl-macs" "cl-macs.el" "b3031039e82679e5b013ce1cbf174ee8")
 ;;; Generated autoloads from cl-macs.el
 
 (autoload 'gensym "cl-macs" "\
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
 (autoload 'lexical-let* "cl-macs" "\
 Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
 The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
-successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
+successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
 as in Common Lisp.  This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
 Common Lisp.
 

diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
index 80e95724f1fb1fb51920b0b583b95509c9beff27..c57d37703b024091ffa76d4b8306f601b9efd120 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
@@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
 (defmacro lexical-let* (bindings &rest body)
   "Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
 The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
-successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
+successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
 as in Common Lisp.  This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
 Common Lisp.
 \n(fn VARLIST BODY)"