; * doc/misc/ert.texi (Introduction): Be more Lisp-specific.

(cherry picked from commit b5967dda32dd9091389e30d8aaa46bdf8319d3e8)

diff --git a/doc/misc/ert.texi b/doc/misc/ert.texi
index f6a90931812c9afed0a00949b8773efdfcd3d519..4f1d287a02c65b6b0be4de91c6eef1b7809c0afc 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/misc/ert.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/ert.texi
@@ -134,11 +134,11 @@ package @file{pp.el}):
 ;; (pp-to-string '('a 'b))                ; same as above
 @end lisp
 
-The code contained in these comments can be evaluated from time to
-time to compare the output with the expected output.  ERT formalizes
-this and introduces a common convention, which simplifies Emacs
-development, since programmers no longer have to manually find and
-evaluate such comments.
+The Lisp forms contained in these comments can be evaluated from time to
+time, e.g. with @kbd{C-x C-e}, to compare the output with the expected
+output.  ERT formalizes this and introduces a common convention, which
+simplifies Emacs development, since programmers no longer have to
+manually find and evaluate such comments.
 
 An ERT test definition equivalent to the above comments is this: