(History and Acknowledgements): Recognize that Emacs

now does have floating point.

diff --git a/man/ChangeLog b/man/ChangeLog
index 96f88717e5c74007683c65517c8bf1a01932b6d4..32836432ddffd06c285594a8b0d24dbf9dce1da8 100644 (file)
--- a/man/ChangeLog
+++ b/man/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-12-19  Richard Stallman  <rms@gnu.org>
+
+       * calc.texi (History and Acknowledgements): Recognize that Emacs
+       now does have floating point.
+
 2006-12-19  Kim F. Storm  <storm@cua.dk>
 
        * major.texi (Choosing Modes): Describe match-function elements for

diff --git a/man/calc.texi b/man/calc.texi
index 6f3082fb776aaa86ae1503c2dff41d0eb0409fb3..d38becd46d9a153418b9b686260a9c99fc130fe1 100644 (file)
--- a/man/calc.texi
+++ b/man/calc.texi
@@ -1539,7 +1539,8 @@ To make a long story short, Emacs Lisp turned out to be a distressingly
 solid implementation of Lisp, and the humble task of calculating
 turned out to be more open-ended than one might have expected.
 
-Emacs Lisp doesn't have built-in floating point math, so it had to be
+Emacs Lisp didn't have built-in floating point math (now it does), so
+this had to be
 simulated in software.  In fact, Emacs integers will only comfortably
 fit six decimal digits or so---not enough for a decent calculator.  So
 I had to write my own high-precision integer code as well, and once I had