for the detailed raw data. Reporting the facts is straightforward,
but many people strain to posit explanations and report them instead
of the facts. If the explanations are based on guesses about how
-Emacs is implemented, they night not be useful; meanwhile, lacking the
+Emacs is implemented, they might not be useful; meanwhile, lacking the
facts, we will have no real information about the bug. If you want to
actually @emph{debug} the problem, and report explanations that are
more than guesses, that is useful---but please include the raw facts
ignored as well, as are display properties and invisible text.
For these reasons, the results are not generally reliable;
for accurate dimensions of text as it will be displayed,
-use `window-text-pixel-size' instead.
+use `string-pixel-width' or `window-text-pixel-size' instead.
usage: (string-width STRING &optional FROM TO) */)
(Lisp_Object str, Lisp_Object from, Lisp_Object to)
{