This warning can be suppressed using 'with-suppressed-warnings' with
the warning name 'suspicious'.
+---
+*** Warn about useless trailing 'cond' clauses.
+The compiler now warns when a 'cond' form contains clauses following a
+default (unconditional) clause. Example:
+
+ (cond ((= x 0) (say "none"))
+ (t (say "some"))
+ (say "goodbye"))
+
+Such a clause will never be executed but is likely to be a mistake,
+perhaps due to misplaced brackets.
+
+This warning can be suppressed using 'with-suppressed-warnings' with
+the warning name 'suspicious'.
+
---
*** Warn about mutation of constant values.
The compiler now warns about code that modifies program constants in
(let ((fn (car-safe form)))
(pcase form
(`(cond . ,clauses)
- (macroexp--cons fn (macroexp--all-clauses clauses) form))
+ ;; Check for rubbish clauses at the end before macro-expansion,
+ ;; to avoid nuisance warnings from clauses that become
+ ;; unconditional through that process.
+ ;; FIXME: this strategy is defeated by forced `macroexpand-all',
+ ;; such as in `cl-flet'. Haven't seen that in the wild, though.
+ (let ((default-tail nil)
+ (n 0)
+ (rest clauses))
+ (while rest
+ (let ((c (car-safe (car rest))))
+ (when (cond ((consp c) (and (memq (car c) '(quote function))
+ (cadr c)))
+ ((symbolp c) (or (eq c t) (keywordp c)))
+ (t t))
+ ;; This is unquestionably a default clause.
+ (setq default-tail (cdr rest))
+ (setq clauses (take (1+ n) clauses)) ; trim the tail
+ (setq rest nil)))
+ (setq n (1+ n))
+ (setq rest (cdr rest)))
+ (let ((expanded-form
+ (macroexp--cons fn (macroexp--all-clauses clauses) form)))
+ (if default-tail
+ (macroexp-warn-and-return
+ (format-message
+ "Useless clause following default `cond' clause")
+ expanded-form '(suspicious cond) t default-tail)
+ expanded-form))))
(`(condition-case . ,(or `(,err ,body . ,handlers) pcase--dontcare))
(let ((exp-body (macroexp--expand-all body)))
(if handlers