; Fix node name in emacs-lisp-intro.texi

* doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
(Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example): Renamed from "... vs. ...",
to avoid using period in node names.

(cherry picked from commit 861b7864fc4b8319a8f8756f02e9a4cfcc25bbfe)

diff --git a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
index 2f8df4493791afc19574b57aa77798abf3bbec67..0b513007fcece21dd69ca14d72e968ea7b2dfb81 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
+++ b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
@@ -3773,7 +3773,7 @@ elisp, The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual}.
 
 @menu
 * Lexical & Dynamic Binding Differences::
-* Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding Example::
+* Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example::
 @end menu
 
 @node Lexical & Dynamic Binding Differences
@@ -3810,7 +3810,7 @@ on the top of the stack, and then executes the @code{let} body.  Once
 the @code{let} body finishes, it takes that binding off of the stack,
 revealing the one it had (if any) before the @code{let} expression.
 
-@node Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding Example
+@node Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example
 @unnumberedsubsubsec Example of Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding
 In some cases, both lexical and dynamic binding behave identically.
 However, in other cases, they can change the meaning of your program.