This fixes a bug that miscompiled
(cond ... C S1...Sn)
where S1...Sn are switch clauses (that can be compiled into a switch
op) and C a non-switch clause, by tucking on an extra copy of C at the
end. This was a serious wrong-code bug when the condition of C had
side-effects; otherwise it was only a waste of time and space.
* lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-cond): Fix.
* test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-tests.el (bytecomp-tests--test-cases):
Add test case.
(if switch-prefix
(progn
(byte-compile-cond-jump-table (cdr switch-prefix) donetag)
+ (setq clause nil)
(setq clauses (car switch-prefix)))
(setq clause (car clauses))
(cond ((or (eq (car clause) t)
(bytecomp-test-identity 3)
(error 'bad)
(:success)) ; empty handler
+
+ ;; `cond' miscompilation bug
+ (let ((fn (lambda (x)
+ (let ((y nil))
+ (cond ((progn (setq x (1+ x)) (> x 10)) (setq y 'a))
+ ((eq x 1) (setq y 'b))
+ ((eq x 2) (setq y 'c)))
+ (list x y)))))
+ (mapcar fn (bytecomp-test-identity '(0 1 2 3 10 11))))
)
"List of expressions for cross-testing interpreted and compiled code.")