(defconst undo-equiv-table (make-hash-table :test 'eq :weakness t)
"Table mapping redo records to the corresponding undo one.
-A redo record for undo-in-region maps to t.
-A redo record for ordinary undo maps to the following (earlier) undo.")
+A redo record for an undo in region maps to 'undo-in-region.
+A redo record for ordinary undo maps to the following (earlier) undo.
+A redo record that undoes to the beginning of the undo list maps to t.
+In the rare case where there are (erroneously) consecutive nil's in
+`buffer-undo-list', `undo' maps the previous valid undo record to
+'empty, if the previous record is a redo record, `undo' doesn't change
+its mapping.
+
+To be clear, a redo record is just an undo record, the only difference
+is that it is created by an undo command (instead of an ordinary buffer
+edit). Since a record used to undo ordinary change is called undo
+record, a record used to undo an undo is called redo record.
+
+`undo' uses this table to make sure the previous command is `undo'.
+`undo-redo' uses this table to set the correct `pending-undo-list'.
+
+When you undo, `pending-undo-list' shrinks and `buffer-undo-list'
+grows, and Emacs maps the tip of `buffer-undo-list' to the tip of
+`pending-undo-list' in this table.
+
+For example, consider this undo list where each node represents an
+undo record: if we undo from 4, `pending-undo-list' will be at 3,
+`buffer-undo-list' at 5, and 5 will map to 3.
+
+ |
+ 3 5
+ | /
+ |/
+ 4")
(defvar undo-in-region nil
"Non-nil if `pending-undo-list' is not just a tail of `buffer-undo-list'.")
;; the next command should not be a "consecutive undo".
;; So set `this-command' to something other than `undo'.
(setq this-command 'undo-start)
-
+ ;; Here we decide whether to break the undo chain. If the
+ ;; previous command is `undo', we don't call `undo-start', i.e.,
+ ;; don't break the undo chain.
(unless (and (eq last-command 'undo)
(or (eq pending-undo-list t)
;; If something (a timer or filter?) changed the buffer
;; undo-redo-undo-redo-... so skip to the very last equiv.
(while (let ((next (gethash equiv undo-equiv-table)))
(if next (setq equiv next))))
- (setq pending-undo-list equiv)))
+ (setq pending-undo-list (if (consp equiv) equiv t))))
(undo-more
(if (numberp arg)
(prefix-numeric-value arg)
(while (eq (car list) nil)
(setq list (cdr list)))
(puthash list
- ;; Prevent identity mapping. This can happen if
- ;; consecutive nils are erroneously in undo list.
- (if (or undo-in-region (eq list pending-undo-list))
- t
- pending-undo-list)
+ (cond
+ (undo-in-region 'undo-in-region)
+ ;; Prevent identity mapping. This can happen if
+ ;; consecutive nils are erroneously in undo list. It
+ ;; has to map to _something_ so that the next `undo'
+ ;; command recognizes that the previous command is
+ ;; `undo' and doesn't break the undo chain.
+ ((eq list pending-undo-list)
+ (or (gethash list undo-equiv-table)
+ 'empty))
+ (t pending-undo-list))
undo-equiv-table))
;; Don't specify a position in the undo record for the undo command.
;; Instead, undoing this should move point to where the change is.
undo-elt)
(while ulist
(when undo-no-redo
- (while (gethash ulist undo-equiv-table)
+ (while (consp (gethash ulist undo-equiv-table))
(setq ulist (gethash ulist undo-equiv-table))))
(setq undo-elt (car ulist))
(cond
(simple-tests--exec '(backward-char undo-redo undo-redo))
(should (equal (buffer-string) "abc"))
(simple-tests--exec '(backward-char undo-redo undo-redo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "abcde")))
+ ;; Test undo/redo in region.
+ (with-temp-buffer
+ (buffer-enable-undo)
+ (dolist (x '("a" "b" "c" "d" "e"))
+ (insert x)
+ (undo-boundary))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "abcde"))
+ ;; The test does this: activate region, `undo', break the undo
+ ;; chain (by deactivating and reactivating the region), then
+ ;; `undo-only'. There used to be a bug in
+ ;; `undo-make-selective-list' that makes `undo-only' error out in
+ ;; that case, which is fixed by in the same commit as this change.
+ (simple-tests--exec '(move-beginning-of-line
+ push-mark-command
+ forward-char
+ forward-char
+ undo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "acde"))
+ (simple-tests--exec '(move-beginning-of-line
+ push-mark-command
+ forward-char
+ forward-char
+ undo-only))
(should (equal (buffer-string) "abcde"))
- ))
+ ;; Rest are simple redo in region tests.
+ (simple-tests--exec '(undo-redo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "acde"))
+ (simple-tests--exec '(undo-redo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "abcde"))))
+
+(defun simple-tests--sans-leading-nil (lst)
+ "Return LST sans the leading nils."
+ (while (and (consp lst) (null (car lst)))
+ (setq lst (cdr lst)))
+ lst)
+
+(ert-deftest simple-tests--undo-equiv-table ()
+ (with-temp-buffer
+ (buffer-enable-undo)
+ (let ((ul-hash-table (make-hash-table :test #'equal)))
+ (dolist (x '("a" "b" "c"))
+ (insert x)
+ (puthash x (simple-tests--sans-leading-nil buffer-undo-list)
+ ul-hash-table)
+ (undo-boundary))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "abc"))
+ ;; Tests mappings in `undo-equiv-table'.
+ (simple-tests--exec '(undo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "ab"))
+ (should (eq (gethash (simple-tests--sans-leading-nil
+ buffer-undo-list)
+ undo-equiv-table)
+ (gethash "b" ul-hash-table)))
+ (simple-tests--exec '(backward-char undo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "abc"))
+ (should (eq (gethash (simple-tests--sans-leading-nil
+ buffer-undo-list)
+ undo-equiv-table)
+ (gethash "c" ul-hash-table)))
+ ;; Undo in region should map to 'undo-in-region.
+ (simple-tests--exec '(backward-char
+ push-mark-command
+ move-end-of-line
+ undo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "ab"))
+ (should (eq (gethash (simple-tests--sans-leading-nil
+ buffer-undo-list)
+ undo-equiv-table)
+ 'undo-in-region))
+ ;; The undo that undoes to the beginning should map to t.
+ (deactivate-mark 'force)
+ (simple-tests--exec '(backward-char
+ undo undo undo
+ undo undo undo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) ""))
+ (should (eq (gethash (simple-tests--sans-leading-nil
+ buffer-undo-list)
+ undo-equiv-table)
+ t))
+ ;; Erroneous nil undo should map to 'empty.
+ (insert "a")
+ (undo-boundary)
+ (push nil buffer-undo-list)
+ (simple-tests--exec '(backward-char undo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "a"))
+ (should (eq (gethash (simple-tests--sans-leading-nil
+ buffer-undo-list)
+ undo-equiv-table)
+ 'empty))
+ ;; But if the previous record is a redo record, its mapping
+ ;; shouldn't change.
+ (insert "e")
+ (undo-boundary)
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "ea"))
+ (puthash "e" (simple-tests--sans-leading-nil buffer-undo-list)
+ ul-hash-table)
+ (insert "a")
+ (undo-boundary)
+ (simple-tests--exec '(backward-char undo))
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "ea"))
+ (push nil buffer-undo-list)
+ (simple-tests--exec '(forward-char undo))
+ ;; Buffer content should change since we just undid a nil
+ ;; record.
+ (should (equal (buffer-string) "ea"))
+ ;; The previous redo record shouldn't map to empty.
+ (should (equal (gethash (simple-tests--sans-leading-nil
+ buffer-undo-list)
+ undo-equiv-table)
+ (gethash "e" ul-hash-table))))))
;;; undo auto-boundary tests
(ert-deftest undo-auto-boundary-timer ()