The text of the indirect buffer is always identical to the text of its
base buffer; changes made by editing either one are visible immediately
-in the other. But in all other respects, the indirect buffer and its
+in the other. ``Text'' here includes both the characters and their text
+properties. But in all other respects, the indirect buffer and its
base buffer are completely separate. They can have different names,
different values of point, different narrowing, different markers,
-different major modes, and different local variables.
+different overlays, different major modes, and different local variables.
An indirect buffer cannot visit a file, but its base buffer can. If
you try to save the indirect buffer, that actually works by saving the
named @var{indirect-name} from a buffer @var{base-buffer}, prompting for
both using the minibuffer.
+Note: When a modification is made to the text of a buffer, the
+modification hooks are run only in the base buffer, because most of
+the functions on those hooks are not prepared to work correctly in
+indirect buffers. So if you need a modification hook function in an
+indirect buffer, you need to manually add that function to the hook
+@emph{in the base buffer} and then make the function operate in the
+desired indirect buffer.
+
@node Buffer Convenience
@section Convenience Features and Customization of Buffer Handling