;; Maybe we've bumped into an escaped newline.
(sh-is-quoted-p (point)))
(backward-char 1))
- (when (eq (char-before) ?|)
+ (when (and
+ (eq (char-before) ?|)
+ (not (eq (char-before (1- (point))) ?\;)))
(backward-char 1) t)))
(and (> (point) (1+ (point-min)))
(progn (backward-char 2)
;; a normal command rather than the real `in' keyword.
;; I.e. we should look back to try and find the
;; corresponding `case'.
- (and (looking-at ";[;&]\\|\\_<in")
+ (and (looking-at ";\\(?:;&?\\|[&|]\\)\\|\\_<in")
;; ";; esac )" is a case that looks
;; like a case-pattern but it's really just a close
;; paren after a case statement. I.e. if we skipped
(pattern (rpattern) ("case-(" rpattern))
(branches (branches ";;" branches)
(branches ";&" branches) (branches ";;&" branches) ;bash.
+ (branches ";|" branches) ;zsh.
(pattern "case-)" cmd)))
- '((assoc ";;" ";&" ";;&"))
+ '((assoc ";;" ";&" ";;&" ";|"))
'((assoc ";" "&") (assoc "&&" "||") (assoc "|" "|&")))))
(defconst sh-smie--sh-operators
`(column . ,(smie-indent-virtual))))))
;; FIXME: Maybe this handling of ;; should be made into
;; a smie-rule-terminator function that takes the substitute ";" as arg.
- (`(:before . ,(or ";;" ";&" ";;&"))
- (if (and (smie-rule-bolp) (looking-at ";;?&?[ \t]*\\(#\\|$\\)"))
+ (`(:before . ,(or ";;" ";&" ";;&" ";|"))
+ (if (and (smie-rule-bolp) (looking-at ";\\(?:;&?\\|[&|]\\)?[ \t]*\\(#\\|$\\)"))
(cons 'column (smie-indent-keyword ";"))
(smie-rule-separator kind)))
- (`(:after . ,(or ";;" ";&" ";;&"))
+ (`(:after . ,(or ";;" ";&" ";;&" ";|"))
(with-demoted-errors "SMIE rule error: %S"
(smie-backward-sexp token)
(cons 'column
(pattern (pattern "|" pattern))
(branches (branches ";;" branches)
(branches ";&" branches) (branches ";;&" branches) ;bash.
+ (branches ";|" branches) ;zsh.
(pattern "case-)" cmd)))
- '((assoc ";;" ";&" ";;&"))
+ '((assoc ";;" ";&" ";;&" ";|"))
'((assoc "case") (assoc ";" "&") (assoc "&&" "||") (assoc "|" "|&")))))
(defun sh-smie--rc-after-special-arg-p ()