Fix ert-tests when running compiled

* test/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.el (ert-test-deftest): Don't test for
specific macroexpansion, just check result of evaluation.
(ert-test-record-backtrace): Don't hardcode representation of closure in
expected backtrace, this lets the test succeed even when the test code
is compiled.

* lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el (ert--expand-should-1): Also pass
`byte-compile-macro-environment' to `macroexpand', this allows the
`should' macro to properly handle macroexpansion of macros that were
defined in the same file when it's being compiled (Bug #17851).

diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el
index 0308c9cd37cbb4ab5a2f6900be9bcdeef49aa1ca..89f83ddff437cdc19d9f4de6ff8d40568efdc464 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el
@@ -276,11 +276,12 @@ DATA is displayed to the user and should state the reason for skipping."
 (defun ert--expand-should-1 (whole form inner-expander)
   "Helper function for the `should' macro and its variants."
   (let ((form
-         (macroexpand form (cond
-                            ((boundp 'macroexpand-all-environment)
-                             macroexpand-all-environment)
-                            ((boundp 'cl-macro-environment)
-                             cl-macro-environment)))))
+         (macroexpand form (append byte-compile-macro-environment
+                                   (cond
+                                    ((boundp 'macroexpand-all-environment)
+                                     macroexpand-all-environment)
+                                    ((boundp 'cl-macro-environment)
+                                     cl-macro-environment))))))
     (cond
      ((or (atom form) (ert--special-operator-p (car form)))
       (let ((value (cl-gensym "value-")))

diff --git a/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.el b/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.el
index 5d3675553d71e3793bc951ead95bebca67d60638..83fddd15165bed5a944c04539d115d9b7fe59d3e 100644 (file)
--- a/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.el
+++ b/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.el
@@ -344,53 +344,35 @@ This macro is used to test if macroexpansion in `should' works."
        ((error)
         (should (equal actual-condition expected-condition)))))))
 
+(defun ert-test--which-file ()
+  "Dummy function to help test `symbol-file' for tests.")
+
 (ert-deftest ert-test-deftest ()
-  ;; FIXME: These tests don't look very good.  What is their intent, i.e. what
-  ;; are they really testing?  The precise generated code shouldn't matter, so
-  ;; we should either test the behavior of the code, or else try to express the
-  ;; kind of efficiency guarantees we're looking for.
-  (should (equal (macroexpand '(ert-deftest abc () "foo" :tags '(bar)))
-                '(progn
-                   (ert-set-test 'abc
-                                 (progn
-                                   "Constructor for objects of type `ert-test'."
-                                   (vector 'cl-struct-ert-test 'abc "foo"
-                                           #'(lambda nil)
-                                           nil ':passed
-                                           '(bar))))
-                   (setq current-load-list
-                         (cons
-                          '(ert-deftest . abc)
-                          current-load-list))
-                   'abc)))
-  (should (equal (macroexpand '(ert-deftest def ()
-                                 :expected-result ':passed))
-                '(progn
-                   (ert-set-test 'def
-                                 (progn
-                                   "Constructor for objects of type `ert-test'."
-                                   (vector 'cl-struct-ert-test 'def nil
-                                           #'(lambda nil)
-                                           nil ':passed 'nil)))
-                   (setq current-load-list
-                         (cons
-                          '(ert-deftest . def)
-                          current-load-list))
-                   'def)))
+  (ert-deftest ert-test-abc () "foo" :tags '(bar))
+  (let ((abc (ert-get-test 'ert-test-abc)))
+    (should (equal (ert-test-tags abc) '(bar)))
+    (should (equal (ert-test-documentation abc) "foo")))
+  (should (equal (symbol-file 'ert-test-deftest 'ert-deftest)
+                 (symbol-file 'ert-test--which-file 'defun)))
+
+  (ert-deftest ert-test-def () :expected-result ':passed)
+  (let ((def (ert-get-test 'ert-test-def)))
+    (should (equal (ert-test-expected-result-type def) :passed)))
   ;; :documentation keyword is forbidden
   (should-error (macroexpand '(ert-deftest ghi ()
                                 :documentation "foo"))))
 
 (ert-deftest ert-test-record-backtrace ()
-  (let ((test (make-ert-test :body (lambda () (ert-fail "foo")))))
-    (let ((result (ert-run-test test)))
-      (should (ert-test-failed-p result))
-      (with-temp-buffer
-        (ert--print-backtrace (ert-test-failed-backtrace result))
-        (goto-char (point-min))
-       (end-of-line)
-       (let ((first-line (buffer-substring-no-properties (point-min) (point))))
-         (should (equal first-line "  (closure (ert--test-body-was-run t) nil (ert-fail \"foo\"))()")))))))
+  (let* ((test-body (lambda () (ert-fail "foo")))
+         (test (make-ert-test :body test-body))
+         (result (ert-run-test test)))
+    (should (ert-test-failed-p result))
+    (with-temp-buffer
+      (ert--print-backtrace (ert-test-failed-backtrace result))
+      (goto-char (point-min))
+      (end-of-line)
+      (let ((first-line (buffer-substring-no-properties (point-min) (point))))
+        (should (equal first-line (format "  %S()" test-body)))))))
 
 (ert-deftest ert-test-messages ()
   :tags '(:causes-redisplay)
@@ -837,7 +819,3 @@ This macro is used to test if macroexpansion in `should' works."
 (provide 'ert-tests)
 
 ;;; ert-tests.el ends here
-
-;; Local Variables:
-;; no-byte-compile: t
-;; End: