src/gmalloc.c
- contains numerous copyrights from the GNU C library. Leave them alone.
-[src/unexhp9k800.c - removed 2007/1/27
+[src/unexhp9k800.c - removed 2007/1/27]
[src/m/sr2k.h - removed 2007/1/27]
- First file removed due to legal uncertainties; second file removed
due to dependency on first. Note that src/m/hp800.h is still needed on
Is it OK to just `cvs remove' a file for legal reasons, or is
something more drastic needed? A removed file is still available from
CVS, if suitable options are applied.
+ rms: will ask lawyer
All README (and other such files) that are non-trivial and were added
by Emacs developers need copyright statements and copying permissions
to be added.
+ lisp/term/README (author)?
+ etc/BABYL?
+ borderline "trivial" cases...?
All images files that allow for comments should have copyright and
Author is Martin Buchholz, but no assignment from him on file, and
rms has no way to reach him.
admin/make-announcement - no copyright
-admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright
+admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright (author andrewi@gnu.org? mail sent)
etc/ms-kermit - no copyright, but ms-7bkermit has one
etc/e/eterm-color.ti - no copyright
rms: "I think that is not copyrightable under the merger doctrine
Arnold as the starting point. However, it may be that we need to get
and insert whatever his license was for his code."
+ - 1984 version of ctags, with no copyright, posted to net.sources:
+ http://groups.google.com/group/net.sources/msg/a21b6c21be12a98d
+
lispref/back.texi, elisp-covers.texi, lay-flat.texi,
two-volume-cross-refs.txt, two.el