Add some concept index entries for custom types

* doc/lispref/customize.texi (Composite Types): Add concept
index entries for restricted-sexp, radio and choice (bug#7385).

diff --git a/doc/lispref/customize.texi b/doc/lispref/customize.texi
index 994c346331f929f9910f33778b321106611df9cf..14e6eb3ab25f5a8f5ecfa81eab19d3f2f3693532 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/lispref/customize.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/customize.texi
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ most general last.  Here's an example of proper usage:
 This way, the special value @code{nil} is not treated like other
 symbols, and symbols are not treated like other Lisp expressions.
 
+@cindex radio, customization types
 @item (radio @var{element-types}@dots{})
 This is similar to @code{choice}, except that the choices are displayed
 using radio buttons rather than a menu.  This has the advantage of
@@ -936,6 +937,7 @@ The value must be a list and each element of the list must fit the type
 list of elements, with @samp{[INS]} and @samp{[DEL]} buttons for adding
 more elements or removing elements.
 
+@cindex restricted-sexp, customization types
 @item (restricted-sexp :match-alternatives @var{criteria})
 This is the most general composite type construct.  The value may be
 any Lisp object that satisfies one of @var{criteria}.  @var{criteria}
@@ -1020,6 +1022,7 @@ and whose remaining arguments should be zero or more of @code{foo} and
 This matches values such as @code{(baz)}, @code{(baz foo)}, @code{(baz bar)}
 and @code{(baz foo bar)}.
 
+@cindex choice, customization types
   When the element-type is a @code{choice}, you use @code{:inline} not
 in the @code{choice} itself, but in (some of) the alternatives of the
 @code{choice}.  For example, to match a list which must start with a