;; line was fouled up by context fontification.
(save-restriction
(widen)
- (let (new-beg new-end new-region case-fold-search string-fence-beg lim)
- ;; Check how far back we need to extend the region where we reapply the
- ;; string fence syntax-table properties. These must be in place for the
- ;; coming fontification operations.
- (save-excursion
- (goto-char (if c-in-after-change-fontification
- (min beg c-new-BEG)
- beg))
- (setq lim (max (- (point) 500) (point-min)))
- (while
+ (let (new-beg new-end new-region case-fold-search)
+ (c-save-buffer-state nil
+ ;; Temporarily reapply the string fence syntax-table properties.
+ (unwind-protect
(progn
- (skip-chars-backward "^\"" lim)
- (or (bobp) (backward-char))
- (save-excursion
- (eq (logand (skip-chars-backward "\\\\") 1) 1))))
- (setq string-fence-beg
- (cond ((c-get-char-property (point) 'c-fl-syn-tab)
- (point))
- (c-in-after-change-fontification
- c-new-BEG)
- (t beg)))
- (c-save-buffer-state nil
- ;; Temporarily reapply the string fence syntax-table properties.
- (unwind-protect
- (progn
- (c-restore-string-fences)
- (if (and c-in-after-change-fontification
- (< beg c-new-END) (> end c-new-BEG))
- ;; Region and the latest after-change fontification region overlap.
- ;; Determine the upper and lower bounds of our adjusted region
- ;; separately.
- (progn
- (if (<= beg c-new-BEG)
- (setq c-in-after-change-fontification nil))
- (setq new-beg
- (if (and (>= beg (c-point 'bol c-new-BEG))
- (<= beg c-new-BEG))
- ;; Either jit-lock has accepted `c-new-BEG', or has
- ;; (probably) extended the change region spuriously
- ;; to BOL, which position likely has a
- ;; syntactically different position. To ensure
- ;; correct fontification, we start at `c-new-BEG',
- ;; assuming any characters to the left of
- ;; `c-new-BEG' on the line do not require
- ;; fontification.
- c-new-BEG
- (setq new-region (c-before-context-fl-expand-region beg end)
- new-end (cdr new-region))
- (car new-region)))
- (setq new-end
- (if (and (>= end (c-point 'bol c-new-END))
- (<= end c-new-END))
- c-new-END
- (or new-end
- (cdr (c-before-context-fl-expand-region beg end))))))
- ;; Context (etc.) fontification.
- (setq new-region (c-before-context-fl-expand-region beg end)
- new-beg (car new-region) new-end (cdr new-region)))
- ;; Finally invoke font lock's functionality.
- (funcall (default-value 'font-lock-fontify-region-function)
- new-beg new-end verbose))
- (c-clear-string-fences)))))))
+ (c-restore-string-fences)
+ (if (and c-in-after-change-fontification
+ (< beg c-new-END) (> end c-new-BEG))
+ ;; Region and the latest after-change fontification region overlap.
+ ;; Determine the upper and lower bounds of our adjusted region
+ ;; separately.
+ (progn
+ (if (<= beg c-new-BEG)
+ (setq c-in-after-change-fontification nil))
+ (setq new-beg
+ (if (and (>= beg (c-point 'bol c-new-BEG))
+ (<= beg c-new-BEG))
+ ;; Either jit-lock has accepted `c-new-BEG', or has
+ ;; (probably) extended the change region spuriously
+ ;; to BOL, which position likely has a
+ ;; syntactically different position. To ensure
+ ;; correct fontification, we start at `c-new-BEG',
+ ;; assuming any characters to the left of
+ ;; `c-new-BEG' on the line do not require
+ ;; fontification.
+ c-new-BEG
+ (setq new-region (c-before-context-fl-expand-region beg end)
+ new-end (cdr new-region))
+ (car new-region)))
+ (setq new-end
+ (if (and (>= end (c-point 'bol c-new-END))
+ (<= end c-new-END))
+ c-new-END
+ (or new-end
+ (cdr (c-before-context-fl-expand-region beg end))))))
+ ;; Context (etc.) fontification.
+ (setq new-region (c-before-context-fl-expand-region beg end)
+ new-beg (car new-region) new-end (cdr new-region)))
+ ;; Finally invoke font lock's functionality.
+ (funcall (default-value 'font-lock-fontify-region-function)
+ new-beg new-end verbose))
+ (c-clear-string-fences))))))
(defun c-after-font-lock-init ()
;; Put on `font-lock-mode-hook'. This function ensures our after-change