;; documentation of that function.
;;
;; Today's appointment list is initialized from the diary when this
-;; package is activated. Additionally, the appointments list is
+;; package is activated. Additionally, the appointments list is
;; recreated automatically at 12:01am for those who do not logout
-;; every day or are programming late. It is also updated when the
-;; `diary-file' is saved. Calling `appt-check' with an argument forces
-;; a re-initialization at any time.
+;; every day or are programming late. It is also updated when the
+;; `diary-file' is saved. Calling `appt-check' with an argument (or
+;; re-enabling the package) forces a re-initialization at any time.
;;
;; In order to add or delete items from today's list, without
;; changing the diary file, use `appt-add' and `appt-delete'.
(delq elt appt-time-msg-list))))
(if diary-entries-list
;; Cycle through the entry-list (diary-entries-list)
- ;; looking for entries beginning with a time. If the
+ ;; looking for entries beginning with a time. If the
;; entry begins with a time, add it to the
;; appt-time-msg-list. Then sort the list.
(let ((entry-list diary-entries-list)
;; The display-time call was not necessary, AFAICS.
;; What was really needed was to add the hook and load this file.
;; Calling (diary 0) once the hook had been added was in some sense a
-;; roundabout way of loading this file. This file used to have code at
+;; roundabout way of loading this file. This file used to have code at
;; the top-level that set up the appt-timer and global-mode-string.
;; One way to maintain backwards compatibility would be to call
-;; (appt-activate 1) at top-level. However, this goes against the
+;; (appt-activate 1) at top-level. However, this goes against the
;; convention that just loading an Emacs package should not activate
-;; it. Instead, we make appt-make-list activate the package (after a
-;; suggestion from rms). This means that one has to call diary in
+;; it. Instead, we make appt-make-list activate the package (after a
+;; suggestion from rms). This means that one has to call diary in
;; order to get it to work, but that is in line with the old (weird,
;; IMO) documented behavior for activating the package.
;; Actually, since (diary 0) does not run diary-hook, I don't think