+2005-01-05 Reiner Steib <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de>
+
+ * spam.el (spam-face): New face. Don't use `gnus-splash-face'
+ which is unreadable in some setups.
+
2004-12-27 Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
* mm-bodies.el (mm-body-encoding): Don't permit 7-bit to be used
:type '(radio (const nil) regexp)
:group 'spam)
-(defcustom spam-face 'gnus-splash-face
+(defface spam-face
+ '((((class color) (type tty) (background dark))
+ (:foreground "gray80" :background "gray50"))
+ (((class color) (type tty) (background light))
+ (:foreground "gray50" :background "gray80"))
+ (((class color) (background dark))
+ (:foreground "ivory2"))
+ (((class color) (background light))
+ (:foreground "ivory4"))
+ (t :inverse-video t))
+ "Face for spam-marked articles.")
+
+(defcustom spam-face 'spam-face
"Face for spam-marked articles."
:type 'face
:group 'spam)
+2005-01-06 Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>
+
+ * message.texi (Reply): `message-reply-to-function' should return
+ a list. Suggested by ARISAWA Akihiro <ari@mbf.ocn.co.jp>.
+
2005-01-06 Hiroshi Fujishima <pooh@nature.tsukuba.ac.jp> (tiny change)
* faq.texi (Changing load-path): Fix typo.
This function will be called narrowed to the head of the article that is
being replied to.
-As you can see, this function should return a string if it has an
-opinion as to what the To header should be. If it does not, it should
-just return @code{nil}, and the normal methods for determining the To
-header will be used.
-
-This function can also return a list. In that case, each list element
-should be a cons, where the @sc{car} should be the name of a header
-(e.g. @code{Cc}) and the @sc{cdr} should be the header value
-(e.g. @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}). All these headers will be inserted into
-the head of the outgoing mail.
+As you can see, this function should return a list. In this case, it
+returns @code{((To . "Whom"))} if it has an opinion as to what the To
+header should be. If it does not, it should just return @code{nil}, and
+the normal methods for determining the To header will be used.
+
+Each list element should be a cons, where the @sc{car} should be the
+name of a header (e.g. @code{Cc}) and the @sc{cdr} should be the header
+value (e.g. @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}). All these headers will be
+inserted into the head of the outgoing mail.
@node Wide Reply