;; IF=ELSE and ELSE=END, we could turn them into IF<ELSE and ELSE>END
;; and IF=END,
-;;; Code:
+;; TODO & BUGS:
+;;
+;; - FIXME: I think the behavior on empty lines is wrong. It shouldn't
+;; look at the next token on subsequent lines.
+;; - Using the structural information SMIE gives us, it should be possible to
+;; implement a `smie-align' command that would automatically figure out what
+;; there is to align and how to do it (something like: align the token of
+;; lowest precedence that appears the same number of times on all lines,
+;; and then do the same on each side of that token).
+;; - Maybe accept two juxtaposed non-terminals in the BNF under the condition
+;; that the first always ends with a terminal, or that the second always
+;; starts with a terminal.
-;; FIXME: I think the behavior on empty lines is wrong. It shouldn't
-;; look at the next token on subsequent lines.
+;;; Code:
(eval-when-compile (require 'cl))
(append names (list (car names)))
" < ")))
+;; (defun smie-check-grammar (grammar prec2 &optional dummy)
+;; (maphash (lambda (k v)
+;; (when (consp k)
+;; (let ((left (nth 2 (assoc (car k) grammar)))
+;; (right (nth 1 (assoc (cdr k) grammar))))
+;; (when (and left right)
+;; (cond
+;; ((< left right) (assert (eq v '<)))
+;; ((> left right) (assert (eq v '>)))
+;; (t (assert (eq v '=))))))))
+;; prec2))
+
(put 'smie-prec2->grammar 'pure t)
(defun smie-prec2->grammar (prec2)
"Take a 2D precedence table and turn it into an alist of precedence levels.
;; left = right).
(unless (caar cst)
(setcar (car cst) i)
+ ;; (smie-check-grammar table prec2 'step1)
(incf i))
(setq csts (delq cst csts))))
(unless progress
(incf i 10))
;; Propagate equalities back to their source.
(dolist (eq (nreverse eqs))
- (assert (or (null (caar eq)) (eq (car eq) (cdr eq))))
- (setcar (car eq) (cadr eq)))
+ (when (null (cadr eq))
+ ;; There's an equality constraint, but we still haven't given
+ ;; it a value: that means it binds tighter than anything else,
+ ;; and it can't be an opener/closer (those don't have equality
+ ;; constraints).
+ ;; So set it here rather than below since doing it below
+ ;; makes it more difficult to obey the equality constraints.
+ (setcar (cdr eq) i)
+ (incf i))
+ (assert (or (null (caar eq)) (eq (caar eq) (cadr eq))))
+ (setcar (car eq) (cadr eq))
+ ;; (smie-check-grammar table prec2 'step2)
+ )
;; Finally, fill in the remaining vars (which only appeared on the
;; right side of the < constraints).
(let ((classification-table (gethash :smie-open/close-alist prec2)))
(incf i))))) ;See other (incf i) above.
(let ((ca (gethash :smie-closer-alist prec2)))
(when ca (push (cons :smie-closer-alist ca) table)))
+ ;; (smie-check-grammar table prec2 'step3)
table))
;;; Parsing using a precedence level table.