+2013-05-04 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
+
+ * cl.texi (Obsolete Macros): Describe replacements for `flet'
+ (bug#14293).
+
2013-04-16 Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
* tramp.texi (Frequently Asked Questions): Precise, how to define
direct C-language calls to the message routines rather than going
through the Lisp @code{message} function.
+For those cases where the dynamic scoping of @code{flet} is desired,
+@code{cl-flet} is clearly not a substitute. The most direct replacement would
+be instead to use @code{cl-letf} to temporarily rebind @code{(symbol-function
+'@var{fun})}. But in most cases, a better substitute is to use an advice, such
+as:
+
+@example
+(defvar my-fun-advice-enable nil)
+(add-advice '@var{fun} :around
+ (lambda (orig &rest args)
+ (if my-fun-advice-enable (do-something)
+ (apply orig args))))
+@end example
+
+so that you can then replace the @code{flet} with a simple dynamically scoped
+binding of @code{my-fun-advice-enable}.
+
@c Bug#411.
-Note that many primitives (e.g., @code{+}) have special byte-compile
-handling. Attempts to redefine such functions using @code{flet} will
-fail if byte-compiled.
+Note that many primitives (e.g., @code{+}) have special byte-compile handling.
+Attempts to redefine such functions using @code{flet}, @code{cl-letf}, or an
+advice will fail when byte-compiled.
@c Or cl-flet.
@c In such cases, use @code{labels} instead.
@end defmac