Fix comment in treesit_record_change (bug#61369)
Turns out the previous commit message and comment is not entirely
correct: the old behavior is in fact wrong, not just "correct but has
problems".
Here is why the old code is wrong:
|visible range| -> markup for visible range
updated range -> markup for updated range
-------------
First we have some text
|aaaaaa|
Now we insert something at the beginning, because we clip
new_end_offset to visible_end, out of eight b's inserted, only the
first six are known to tree-sitter.
|
bbbbbbbbaaaa|aa start: 0, old_end: 0, new_end: 6
------
In treesit_sync_visible_region, we sync up visible region, but the two
missing b's are not in the updated range.
|
bbbbbbbbaaaaaa| start: 12, old_end: 12, new_end: 14
--
The old behavior not only is wrong, but also doesn't make much sense.
* src/treesit.c (treesit_record_change): Update comment.